<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon.com: Adoption Unfriendly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>This isn&#039;t going according to plan...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:48:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: teendoc</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>teendoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>I would think that everything would be similar except for the size of the clothes. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that everything would be similar except for the size of the clothes. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>OK, so while we are on the topic of baby registries.  Can aomeone please direct me to a place that I can find a sample baby registry for an adoptive parent? My baby will be between 7 and 10 months old.  Do I need all the same stuff?  What do I HAVE to have versus would be nice to have?  HELP....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so while we are on the topic of baby registries.  Can aomeone please direct me to a place that I can find a sample baby registry for an adoptive parent? My baby will be between 7 and 10 months old.  Do I need all the same stuff?  What do I HAVE to have versus would be nice to have?  HELP&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Yep, they&#039;re whacked in the head for not being sensitive to this situation. It&#039;s easy coding. They should just do it.

Well, why not screw with their heads in kind? Set your due date out by 15 months or so, of course if the program will let you. :) You can have the longest pregnancy in their database. Hehehehe.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, they&#8217;re whacked in the head for not being sensitive to this situation. It&#8217;s easy coding. They should just do it.</p>
<p>Well, why not screw with their heads in kind? Set your due date out by 15 months or so, of course if the program will let you. <img src='http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  You can have the longest pregnancy in their database. Hehehehe&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K&#38;M</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>K&#38;M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-798</guid>
		<description>i just wish they&#039;d add the piece of code and be done with it.  How hard can it be?   Maybe that&#039;s a simplistic viewpoint, but if the customer wants a feature, add it!  It&#039;s not like you are the only person in the world adopting, there are so many folks that are trying to build their families through adoption.  

It all boils down to the bottom line, as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just wish they&#8217;d add the piece of code and be done with it.  How hard can it be?   Maybe that&#8217;s a simplistic viewpoint, but if the customer wants a feature, add it!  It&#8217;s not like you are the only person in the world adopting, there are so many folks that are trying to build their families through adoption.  </p>
<p>It all boils down to the bottom line, as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teendoc</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>teendoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 06:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Matt,

Thank you for your comment. I do understand that the registry system was undoubtedly set up in this manner out of simplicity and not outright lack of concern about adoptive parents to be. Most likely the designers never even considered adoptive parents in any appreciable manner in their baby registry thought processes. 

I understand that the CSR cannot effect change. My hope is that if enough people in my situation complain, Amazon&#039;s higher ups will deign to take notice and make a simple change to their systems. Pie in the sky dreaming, I know. But I can hope. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment. I do understand that the registry system was undoubtedly set up in this manner out of simplicity and not outright lack of concern about adoptive parents to be. Most likely the designers never even considered adoptive parents in any appreciable manner in their baby registry thought processes. </p>
<p>I understand that the CSR cannot effect change. My hope is that if enough people in my situation complain, Amazon&#8217;s higher ups will deign to take notice and make a simple change to their systems. Pie in the sky dreaming, I know. But I can hope. <img src='http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Frye</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Frye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 02:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Aside from the value of an adoption option from a customer service point of view (and it&#039;s actually a little hard for me to put that aside, but I will for this point), the extra snippet of code that would be required to make adoptive parents feel included is a relatively easy thing to include.

The problem is that Amazon sells their checkout/store as web services to brick and mortar companies that want a profitable web presence.  Since the software is a product in it&#039;s own right, Amazon uses things speed and simplicity to market it to other companies.  The adoption exception may have been part of the original design at some point, but could have been cut to increase performance.  This also means is that there are a lot of other stores that practice the same discrimination, if unintentionally.  Chances are, they don&#039;t have a choice.  The value in Amazon&#039;s web services is that they&#039;re &quot;turn-key.&quot;  

Of course, calling them is a waste of your time.  A CSR on the phone has no authority or instructions to do anything other than apologize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the value of an adoption option from a customer service point of view (and it&#8217;s actually a little hard for me to put that aside, but I will for this point), the extra snippet of code that would be required to make adoptive parents feel included is a relatively easy thing to include.</p>
<p>The problem is that Amazon sells their checkout/store as web services to brick and mortar companies that want a profitable web presence.  Since the software is a product in it&#8217;s own right, Amazon uses things speed and simplicity to market it to other companies.  The adoption exception may have been part of the original design at some point, but could have been cut to increase performance.  This also means is that there are a lot of other stores that practice the same discrimination, if unintentionally.  Chances are, they don&#8217;t have a choice.  The value in Amazon&#8217;s web services is that they&#8217;re &#8220;turn-key.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Of course, calling them is a waste of your time.  A CSR on the phone has no authority or instructions to do anything other than apologize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teendoc</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>teendoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Dear AmazonEmployee,

I appreciate your reply here, but there is a point I am trying to make that I&#039;m not sure you completely recognize. One of the hardest things for an adoptive parent-to-be is the not knowing when you&#039;ll match or if you will match with expectant parents who wish to place their child for adoption. I do understand that I can make up a date and change it at will. However, the date &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; the problem.

Putting in a date causes anxiety about whether we will match before that date. What if we have to wait over 18 months, 2 years? The problem is in having to enter a date at all.

What I am asking is whether there is a means of making the date field optional, period. BabiesRUs has added an &quot;are you adopting&quot; field to their registry. Go the next step and add an &quot;are you adopting&quot; field and then not require a date for those who are adopting. Would that be all that complicated? Considering the fact that you can track my purchases, make recommendations based on my previous orders, and stock everything from groceries to hardware, would making such a change really be &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; hard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear AmazonEmployee,</p>
<p>I appreciate your reply here, but there is a point I am trying to make that I&#8217;m not sure you completely recognize. One of the hardest things for an adoptive parent-to-be is the not knowing when you&#8217;ll match or if you will match with expectant parents who wish to place their child for adoption. I do understand that I can make up a date and change it at will. However, the date <b>is</b> the problem.</p>
<p>Putting in a date causes anxiety about whether we will match before that date. What if we have to wait over 18 months, 2 years? The problem is in having to enter a date at all.</p>
<p>What I am asking is whether there is a means of making the date field optional, period. BabiesRUs has added an &#8220;are you adopting&#8221; field to their registry. Go the next step and add an &#8220;are you adopting&#8221; field and then not require a date for those who are adopting. Would that be all that complicated? Considering the fact that you can track my purchases, make recommendations based on my previous orders, and stock everything from groceries to hardware, would making such a change really be <b>that</b> hard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmazonEmployee</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>AmazonEmployee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-790</guid>
		<description>As an Amazon employee, let me begin by apologizing for the Customer Service response. It is quite possible the the Customer service representative wasnt aware of the options you have. Let me explain,

Although the &#039;due date&#039; terminology doesnt really cater to adoption, you can enter any date you please for that column. Once entered, and information can be changed anytime you want, just like any other customer information on Amazon. This way, you should be able to change your date at any time, to any date. 

I tried creating a fictious account to test this, and it worked. 

I&#039;ll try to forward this to the people at CustomerService to see that this doesnt happen again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Amazon employee, let me begin by apologizing for the Customer Service response. It is quite possible the the Customer service representative wasnt aware of the options you have. Let me explain,</p>
<p>Although the &#8216;due date&#8217; terminology doesnt really cater to adoption, you can enter any date you please for that column. Once entered, and information can be changed anytime you want, just like any other customer information on Amazon. This way, you should be able to change your date at any time, to any date. </p>
<p>I tried creating a fictious account to test this, and it worked. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to forward this to the people at CustomerService to see that this doesnt happen again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyderkl</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>spyderkl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-788</guid>
		<description>Ugh.  That is an abysmal, inexcusable response.  Even if that&#039;s their unchangeable policy, it&#039;s inexcusable.  Bot-like springs to mind.

I do know from experience that at least Babies-R-Us and Target&#039;s registries require a due date.  In the case of Babies-R-Us, I talked with one of the store personnel while registering and told her we were adopting.  She was very helpful, and suggested we go ahead and select a due date 9 months away; if we weren&#039;t placed by then, she assured us it was easy to change.  It was.  I was a little upset at the time about *having* to change the date, but it was easy enough to do.  I wish I could talk about Target, but I seem to have blanked that experience out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.  That is an abysmal, inexcusable response.  Even if that&#8217;s their unchangeable policy, it&#8217;s inexcusable.  Bot-like springs to mind.</p>
<p>I do know from experience that at least Babies-R-Us and Target&#8217;s registries require a due date.  In the case of Babies-R-Us, I talked with one of the store personnel while registering and told her we were adopting.  She was very helpful, and suggested we go ahead and select a due date 9 months away; if we weren&#8217;t placed by then, she assured us it was easy to change.  It was.  I was a little upset at the time about *having* to change the date, but it was easy enough to do.  I wish I could talk about Target, but I seem to have blanked that experience out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lianaandmason.com/dollhouse/2007/02/15/amazoncom-adoption-unfriendly/#comment-787</guid>
		<description>I take back what I wrote - I didn&#039;t research it - you are right - it&#039;s totally fucked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take back what I wrote &#8211; I didn&#8217;t research it &#8211; you are right &#8211; it&#8217;s totally fucked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.820 seconds -->
